Site icon StudentPilot.com

RG Factor: Gear Check

Nearly half of all reported mishaps in retractable-gear airplanes are related to the landing gear system. The vast majority of those appear to be related mainly to pilot action or inaction, often under the stress of distraction. There is a small component of the Landing Gear-Related Mishap (LGRM) record, however, that is a function of aircraft maintenance.

Despite the awful and costly results of a mechanical gear failure, my good friends in the aircraft maintenance and inspection business have countless stories of owners who skim on landing gear upkeep, and many more who, taking their airplane to a mechanic specifically knowledgeable about that type of airplane’s landing gear system for the first time, learn that their ‘regular’ mechanic had overlooked items because of lack of familiarity with the design. In those mechanics’ defense, many of the shop and maintenance manuals put out by lightplane manufacturers are themselves lacking in a lot of detail. Part of that is the result of history-at the time most RG airplanes were designed and marketed it was an entirely valid assumption that any mechanic looking at the airplane had been thoroughly trained in system troubleshooting as a result of World War Two or Korean-era military training. Another part is the fact that aircraft manufacturers until the early 1980s relied on a field maintenance force in factory-authorized service centers where mechanics would work on large numbers of the same design almost exclusively. Unfortunately both assumptions no longer hold true.

On the Ragged Edge
The low purchase price of some early RG airplanes, now 40 and 50 year sold (or older) means that some owners purchase airplanes that are really beyond their means to properly maintain. This creates a class of ownership that is operating on the ragged edge of its ability to safely operate the airplane. A $40,000 B35 Bonanza or Piper Comanche 180, for instance, looks mighty good when compared to what even a Cessna 172 costs-but that $40,000 V-tail is 55 years old, and the Comanche not really much younger. Both will require substantial investment (and not a little salvage-yard scrounging) to keep in top shape. It’s becoming axiomatic that the RG airplanes with the lowest initial acquisition cost, those build before about 1960, really need to be owned by among the wealthiest of pilots, because not only do they need to be maintained as diligently as a new-production RG aircraft, they’ve had decades of use (and sometimes, abuse) that has fatigued and possibly damaged the critical landing gear system. It takes more money and effort to keep up these proud relics of personal aviation’s early days, no less so for the complex landing gear system.

So What Can We Do?
So what can we do to avoid maintenance-related LGRMs? First, be realistic about the costs and obligations of ownership. If your prime reason for choosing that early Mooney over a Cessna 182 is your ability to absorb its lower purchase cost, you may need to seriously re-evaluate your decision. Second, realize that the landing gear system takes a lot of stress every time you fly, and maintain it like the critical component it is.

Exit mobile version