Site icon StudentPilot.com

The ILS

Most pilots with instrument ratings would probably agree that when it comes to an uneventful passage through haze, gloom, or dark of night and back to Mother Earth, an ILS is a much better deal than a VOR approach. Given a choice between the somewhat more relaxed progression of a non-precision descent profile and the relatively more rapid cross-checking required to remain within the allotted confines of a precision approach path, when the chips (and the ceilings) are down, the precision approach is definitely the better of the two. Until there are many more GPS WAAS approaches besides the few now coming online, for a while yet at least, the odds are that if you have to get down through a layer of low clouds, the bases of which might be as low as 200 feet, you’ll be flying an ILS. (Of course, the PAR or precision approach radar that I wrote about last year also qualifies as a precision approach, but I’ll concentrate on the ILS here.) So what is it that makes an ILS so special?

An ILS of course provides very accurate vertical as well as lateral guidance to the extended centerline of what are always relatively long, wide, specifically well-marked, well-lit, and well-maintained runways. (When I say very accurate, I should quantify that. The vertical thickness of an ILS glideslope is but 1.4 degree, top to bottom, and the width of its horizontal component, the localizer, can be as little as three, up to about six degrees.) The runways having an ILS also must have certain unique and easily identified approach light configurations. Another piece of information provided by the various components of an ILS is distance remaining to the runway, as well as target altitudes at certain points along your approach path. Unlike VORs though, an ILS actually uses two signals: a VHF signal (which means anywhere between 30 to 300 MHz) for the localizer, and for the glideslope, an automatically paired and dedicated UHF frequency. (UHF generally means 300 MHz to 3 GHz.) Associated with these, each ILS installation also features so-called ‘marker beacons’ at precisely located intermediate positions along the descent path. These broadcast an upward-directed (but essentially non-directional) elliptical VHF signal at 75 MHz, and each provides its own unique audible as well as visual indication in the cockpit when they are being over-flown, so you have additional information to confirm where you are at that moment. In addition, various forms of approach lights are also part of each ILS installation.

An ILS can have three such beacons in succession, each progressively closer to the runway, although most general aviation pilots flying under Part 91 will usually make use of ILS approaches having only the first two. The first one, the outer marker, is usually located just inside where the glideslope is first intercepted, which can be between 3.5 and seven miles from the runway threshold. Assuming you remembered to turn it on, you would see a purple light on your marker beacon display, and you would also hear a repeating three-dash Morse code identifier (the letter ‘O’) at about 120 Hz (although the actual ‘continuous wave’ sound, if you are musically inclined, would be at about G above middle C, or around 400 Hz). At most single engine approach speeds, you would hear it for perhaps 20 seconds as you flew through the signal. You would hear (and see) the next one, the middle marker, at about 3500 feet from the runway. This would appear to you as a flashing amber beacon with alternating Morse code dots and dashes at the slightly more urgent frequency of about 190 per minute, with the audio tone at a much higher 1300 Hz or so (around an E, two octaves above middle C on the piano). The middle marker is usually activated as you reach decision height about a half-mile from the runway. (Contrary to what you may have hoped, the dots and dashes could be either the letter ‘A’ or the letter ‘N’; the Morse code identifier for the letter ‘M’-as in middle-would be hard to distinguish from the three dashes for the letter ‘O’. But as it turns out, the Morse code assignments are in fact logical, because the Morse signal for the inner marker, usually located right at the runway threshold, is a frantic series of dots at 360 per minute accompanied by a white light and a much higher attention-getting audio frequency of about 3000 Hz, close to an F#, three octaves above middle C.)

There are also other navigational fixes that tell you where you are along the approach which are possible with an ILS. The outer marker might be a so-called locator outer marker (LOM), which means that it also has an associated NDB signal (from about 190 to 530 KHz). There can also be distance information from charted intersections of the localizer with a particular radial from a nearby VOR, and some localizers also have DME capability. And as I mentioned, an ILS-equipped runway also must have approach lighting and easily identifiable runway markings for its threshold, touchdown zone, centerline, edges, and some have a blazing movie marquee of sequenced flashing lights, literally pointing at the runway through the gloom.

I mentioned earlier that an ILS is more accurate. Actually, I can quantify that. An ILS localizer is about four times as accurate as a VOR signal. And the closer you get to the runway, the more accurate it becomes. What this means in practice is that navigation by crisis management, i.e., reacting to needle excursions with over-corrections and then adjustments to those corrections, won’t work on a localizer; you will usually just precipitate a swordfight. Small corrections are the rule here. At the outer marker, a one-dot deflection on a localizer display equates to being about 500 feet off course laterally. Near the middle marker, that becomes just 150 feet to one side. (And at the inner marker, that becomes just tens of feet.) If you think that’s picky, wait until you hear about the glideslope! At the outer marker, a one-dot deviation means you’re 50 feet high or low. At the middle marker, that becomes all of eight feet. (whew!)

There are a few traps lying in wait for the unwary or forgetful:

Exit mobile version